I recently reported on this blog and my Federal Tax Crimes Blog on the Oral Arguments in In Re Grand Jury (Sup Ct. No. 21-1397), docket entries here. See On Supreme Court Oral Argument in In Re Grand Jury On Issue of Principal or Significant Purpose for Attorney-Client Privilege (Federal Tax Procedure Blog 1/17/23), here, linking to On Supreme Court Oral Argument in In Re Grand Jury On Issue of Principal or Significant Purpose for Attorney-Client Privilege (Federal Tax Crimes Blog 1/10/23; 1/11/23), here.
Today, the Supreme Court entered the following order “Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. Opinion per curiam.” See the docket entried liked above and the opinion here.
For further discussion, see Supreme Court Dismisses Attorney-Client Privilege Case as Improvidently Granted (1/23/2023), here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated. Jack Townsend will review and approve comments only to make sure the comments are appropriate. Although comments can be made anonymously, please identify yourself (either by real name or pseudonymn) so that, over a few comments, readers will be able to better judge whether to read the comments and respond to the comments.